Governor Scioli and his' relationships carnal "with Bill Gates: If the President of Argentina praised U.S. President Bush, today would be a national scandal because the government allegedly the first is" national and popular "and a little anti-imperialism, much more if I did a deal with him.
If instead the governor of the Province of Buenos Aires, Daniel Scioli, praises Bill Gates and make agreements, this does not cause any commotion in the town. Why? Among other things, because people do not know about carnal relations between Microsoft and the U.S. central intelligence, or between the same company that Bill is the founder and owner, and the state of their country general. Suffice to search Google "NSA Windows" to get an idea of \u200b\u200bsuch relationships ...
But it is much worse than it looks, because if Microsoft "gives" licenses for 9000 schools in the Province of Buenos Aires, hundreds of thousands of kids in training are captive users of their products again, and not educate in freedom: there will own the software that runs on PCs will not have absolute control over them do not know how they are scheduled programs or operating systems can share will be "monkeys clench keys, people with fewer opportunities creative thinking: their training is deficient, both as if they were taught only to plastic following a painter, or music only on the basis of High School Musical songs.
Using Windows is like privatizing schools computer education. When it comes to proprietary software, we say so because it deprives people of:
1 st use for any purpose
2 nd study how it's done
3 º modify, improve
4 º to back freely, to contribute with society
All that is limited or canceled for the licenses uses the private company Bill Gates, Microsoft, who manages the software, source code and executable programs: the State can not manage it.
Do Argentines want to privatize education?
If instead of Microsoft Windows is using free software, the state would own the software, ie everyone: no education would be privatized.
If you use Windows, computer education is privatized, it passed into the hands of a private company, the state can not see how it is done the software can not develop it fit your needs, improve it, not yours, does not control, students can not learn how to program, teachers can not teach to modify it, or share, or better.
is as if the school libraries at once pass into the hands of the United States, but worse, because they are computers which today form the minds of the kids (and that will be growing), and it will be different release its formation, the formation of oppression and in the spirit of impotence (not able to study, modify and share) and generated by the software division of Microsoft.
Any Argentina wants that?
Otherwise, I leave you with another interesting article on the subject, to which I add this also: Reasons to use free software in education ,
... and pass the following: Argentina: Free Software and education in the Year of Science Education
Source: http://www.mastermagazine.info/articulo/12830.php
If instead the governor of the Province of Buenos Aires, Daniel Scioli, praises Bill Gates and make agreements, this does not cause any commotion in the town. Why? Among other things, because people do not know about carnal relations between Microsoft and the U.S. central intelligence, or between the same company that Bill is the founder and owner, and the state of their country general. Suffice to search Google "NSA Windows" to get an idea of \u200b\u200bsuch relationships ...
But it is much worse than it looks, because if Microsoft "gives" licenses for 9000 schools in the Province of Buenos Aires, hundreds of thousands of kids in training are captive users of their products again, and not educate in freedom: there will own the software that runs on PCs will not have absolute control over them do not know how they are scheduled programs or operating systems can share will be "monkeys clench keys, people with fewer opportunities creative thinking: their training is deficient, both as if they were taught only to plastic following a painter, or music only on the basis of High School Musical songs.
Using Windows is like privatizing schools computer education. When it comes to proprietary software, we say so because it deprives people of:
1 st use for any purpose
2 nd study how it's done
3 º modify, improve
4 º to back freely, to contribute with society
All that is limited or canceled for the licenses uses the private company Bill Gates, Microsoft, who manages the software, source code and executable programs: the State can not manage it.
Do Argentines want to privatize education?
If instead of Microsoft Windows is using free software, the state would own the software, ie everyone: no education would be privatized.
If you use Windows, computer education is privatized, it passed into the hands of a private company, the state can not see how it is done the software can not develop it fit your needs, improve it, not yours, does not control, students can not learn how to program, teachers can not teach to modify it, or share, or better.
is as if the school libraries at once pass into the hands of the United States, but worse, because they are computers which today form the minds of the kids (and that will be growing), and it will be different release its formation, the formation of oppression and in the spirit of impotence (not able to study, modify and share) and generated by the software division of Microsoft.
Any Argentina wants that?
Otherwise, I leave you with another interesting article on the subject, to which I add this also: Reasons to use free software in education ,
... and pass the following: Argentina: Free Software and education in the Year of Science Education
Source: http://www.mastermagazine.info/articulo/12830.php
0 comments:
Post a Comment